Are fossil dating methods accuracy
No matter what the radiometric date turned out to be, our geologist would always be able to ‘interpret’ it.
He would simply change his assumptions about the history of the rock to explain the result in a plausible way. Wasserburg, who received the 1986 Crafoord Prize in Geosciences, said, ‘There are no bad chronometers, only bad interpretations of them!
For example, a geologist may examine a cutting where the rocks appear as shown in Figure 1.
Here he can see that some curved sedimentary rocks have been cut vertically by a sheet of volcanic rock called a dyke.
On his return, he sends his sample to the laboratory for dating, and after a few weeks receives the lab report.In the same way, by identifying fossils, he may have related Sedimentary Rocks B with some other rocks.Creationists would generally agree with the above methods and use them in their geological work.’ In fact, there is a whole range of standard explanations that geologists use to ‘interpret’ radiometric dating results.